FX International Payments
By Frances Coppola
Obviously, international businesses want to avoid what amounts to a tax on their cash reserves. They may also be concerned that in the event of a bank failure, their deposits could be subjected to a haircut, especially in Europe. In 2013, for example, depositors in the Bank of Cyprus lost 60 percent of their holdings above 100,000 euros.3 So international businesses tend only to keep in bank deposit accounts the money needed to make overseas money transfers and other payments. The rest could be held in some form of safe liquid asset, such as government bonds.
But central bank action also is driving down yields on government bonds into negative territory. Since price is the inverse of yield, this means that government bonds are becoming increasingly expensive. And although much government debt is at fixed rate, countries such as Japan and Germany are issuing long-term debt at negative rates: anyone buying these is in effect paying a tax to hold them.4 Central bank action also pushes interest rates on other forms of liquid investment, such as money market funds, into negative territory, since these are a substitute for both bank deposits and short-term government debt. The range of zero or positive-yield liquid assets available to international businesses with cash reserves is shrinking rapidly.
Tying up cash reserves in illiquid assets such as property, or investing them in riskier assets such as equities, doesn’t help international businesses that periodically need large amounts of cash for money transfers. So as negative rates go deeper, it could become attractive for international businesses to hoard physical cash (banknotes).5 This is not cost free, of course: keeping large amounts of physical cash needs space and is a magnet for thieves, so storing cash requires tight security and insurance. In Switzerland, insurance companies report that businesses are increasingly looking for insurance to cover physical cash holdings.6 And in Japan, sales of safes are soaring.7
Central banks are fighting the move to physical cash. In early 2016, the European Central Bank (ECB) announced that it would withdraw the 500 euro note,8 and there have been calls for the U.S. Federal Reserve to withdraw the $100 note. The principal reason for doing so would be to discourage criminal use.9 After India banned 500- and 1,000-rupee notes, UBS Group called for Australia also to eliminate large-denomination notes such as the $100.10 But withdrawing high-denomination notes would also discourage physical cash hoarding, since it increases storage costs. Some analysts suggest that withdrawing these notes clears the path for imposition of much deeper negative rates, since negative rates would be harder to avoid.11
Economists say that widespread hoarding of physical cash would negate the intended effects of negative rates. Because of this, some call for the complete elimination of physical cash.12
Should physical cash be eliminated, there would probably be little effect on international payments and money transfers. After all, no one sends physical cash to foreign countries any more. However, if not all countries imposed deeply negative rates, we might see an increase in overseas money transfers as international businesses move cash reserves to countries where interest rates are higher. We might also see an increase in use of cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin, where identity can be hidden.13
The real impact would be felt domestically. Businesses would find customers making greater use of credit, debit and prepayment cards, as over-the-counter transactions that are currently made in physical cash move even faster to electronic media. Mobile payments using smartphones would also likely increase, and businesses may become more willing to accept unconventional forms of payment. There could also be an increase in electronic money transfers, as people who currently pay bills in cash at bank counters are also forced to use electronic payments. International businesses that currently pay workers in cash would also have to move to online or money transfers.
There are wider social implications, too, including the welfare costs of eliminating cash. Consider that around 6 percent of the population in high-income member countries of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) – and a far higher percentage in developing market countries – do not have bank accounts.14 Governments would have to ensure that these “unbanked” have access to payment systems. This might involve requiring commercial banks to provide basic bank accounts for the poor,15 or it could mean encouraging wider use of mobile money such as smartphone credits, peer-to-peer digital payment services such as Paypal and cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin.
More radically, it might mean that central banks will issue their own electronic transaction currency and provide secure wallets for all individuals and businesses.16 This alternative is already being actively discussed by central banks.
As the slowdown in global trade continues,17 central banks are looking for ways to support their economies. Eliminating physical cash in favour of electronic money could give central banks the flexibility to impose much deeper negative rates. For most international businesses, this would simply accelerate an existing trend, since cash B2B payments largely disappeared a long time ago and customers are increasingly using cards, mobile money and money transfers – although deeply negative rates would be likely to raise business costs. But completely replacing physical cash has wider social implications. Some economists believe it would amount to complete reinvention of the financial system for the 21st century.18
With 17 years experience in the financial industry, Frances is a highly regarded writer and speaker on banking, finance and economics. She writes regularly for the Financial Times, Forbes and a range of financial industry publications. Her writing has featured in The Economist, the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal. She is a frequent commentator on TV, radio and online news media including the BBC and RT TV.
1. “RBS to impose negative rates on some big business customers,”Financial Times;https://www.ft.com/content/d1e91094-7a3e-3e52-8685-b863e4daec67.
2.As at Jan 2017
3. “Customers at Cyprus' biggest bank stung by 60% raid on savings,” The Independent; http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/customers-at-cyprus-biggest-bank-stung-by-60-raid-on-savings-8555078.html.
4. "Germany becomes second G-7 country to issue 10-year bond with negative yield", Reuters; http://www.cnbc.com/2016/07/13/germany-becomes-second-g7-nation-to-issue-10-year-bond-with-a-negative-yield.html
5. "Hoarding Cash in Vaults Seen More Attractive After Brexit Vote”, Bloomberg; http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-06-27/hoarding-cash-in-vaults-seen-more-attractive-after-brexit-vote
6. "Cash In A Box Catches On As Swiss Negative Rates Bite", Bloomberg; http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-09-06/cash-in-a-box-catches-on-in-switzerland-as-negative-rates-bite
7. "Japan’s Negative Interest Rates Are Driving Up Sales Of Safes", Fortune; http://fortune.com/2016/02/23/japans-negative-interest-rate-driving-up-safe-sales/
8. "European Central Bank to withdraw 500 euro note", BBC; http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-36208146
9. "Why $100 Dollar Bills and 500 Euro Notes May Soon Be Killed Off", Time magazine; http://time.com/money/4226174/kill-100-dollar-bill-500-euro-phase-out/
10. "Australia Should Scrap Big-Denomination Bank Notes, UBS Says", Bloomberg; https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-11-13/australia-should-follow-india-and-scrap-big-bank-notes-ubs-says
11. "Here is the real reason why authorities want to ban high-denomination bank notes", Zero Hedge; http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-02-11/here-real-reason-why-authorities-want-ban-high-denomination-bank-notes
12. "Costs and benefits to phasing out paper currency", Harvard University (Ken Rogoff); http://scholar.harvard.edu/files/rogoff/files/c13431.pdf
13. "Will International Payments Technology Move Us Towards A Cashless World?", American Express; https://www.americanexpress.com/us/content/foreign-exchange/articles/cashless-international-payments-new-trend/
14. "The Global Findex Database 2014: measuring financial inclusion around the world,", World Bank; http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/187761468179367706/pdf/WPS7255.pdf?page=3
15. "Payment Accounts Directive", U.K. Financial Conduct Authority; https://www.fca.org.uk/firms/payment-accounts-directive
16. "Digital Cash: Why central banks should start issuing electronic money", Positive Money; http://positivemoney.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Digital_Cash_WebPrintReady_20160113.pdf
17. "The economic implications of China’s import-export trade slowdown", American Express; https://www.americanexpress.com/us/content/foreign-exchange/articles/economic-effects-of-china-economic-slowdown-on-import-export-trade/
18. "Central bank digital money: the end of monetary policy as we know it", Bank Underground; https://bankunderground.co.uk/2016/07/25/central-bank-digital-currency-the-end-of-monetary-policy-as-we-know-it/